Rubrics for Grading
All course requirements shall
be graded based on the following criterion.
Participation
Each activity, or project will
be assigned a grade of 0 (Absent), 1 (Beginning), 2
(Progressing); or 3 (Understanding).
|
|
Beginning |
Progressing |
Understanding |
|
Frequency of
participation in discussion and presence at
said discussions |
Frequently misses
class; fails to participate or comment |
Present for most
classes; chooses to interact in most class
discussions |
Present for almost all
classes; shows continual interaction in
class discussions |
|
Relevance & value of
comments made during discussions and to
presented materials |
Cannot classify or
recognize relevant issues within presented
materials. Is unable to argue views based on
evidence found within discussion |
Makes some relevant
comments; shows a progressing understanding
of presented materials and can defend
personal views and analysis’ |
Comments are relevant
to class discussions. Is able to assemble,
construct and defend argument based on class
materials |
|
Rhetoric (analysis and
interpretation of written, visual and oral
content) |
Frequently
misinterprets materials. Unable to
discriminate or differentiate important
factors in class materials |
Shows progressive
analysis and interpretation of materials. Is
able to provide relevant criticism and
examine presented issues |
Provides well thought
out and informed analysis and interpretation
of presented materials. Can fully appraise
and question presented senarios |
|
Inclusion and
receptivity (self and others) in discussions |
Does not participate;
dismisses opinions of others out of hand.
Unable to recognize diverse opinions.
Demonstrates frustration in views counter to
his/her own. |
Frequent
participation. Examines other views. Is
willing to experiment with newly presented
ideas and opinions. |
Constant
participation; Listens to the ideas of
other; Formulates logically reasoned
critical responses. Values input from all |
|
Articulation,
vocabulary, and presentation of personal
contributions to discussions and class
content |
Unable to describe or
explain views. Difficulty in defining or
illustrating ideas. |
Demonstrates use of
correctly formed, acceptable terminology; Is
able to support his/her self views
contributing manner |
Uses advanced
terminology of subject matter. Effectively
expresses his/her views. Uses well developed
arguments. |
|
Preparation for
content discussions |
Shows little or no
preparation
for pre-assigned
materials. Is unable to define, list or
recall
content |
Shows preparation for
class and use of pre-assigned class
materials. Is able to describe, discuss,
identify and explain materials. |
Is fully prepared for
class room discussion. Is able to illustrate
and formulate presented materials into well
develop oral and written arguments. |
|
Originality in
presented ideas |
Shows little or no
originality in presented or presenting
views. Is unable to assesses or discuss
materials |
Has original content
but still relies heavily on provided
materials. Is able to demonstrate
understanding and interpret materials. |
Shows original
thinking beyond provided materials. Able to
construct, develop, and formulate an
argument and offer oral or written defenses |
Writing
Each written assignment will
be given a grade of 1-100 based on the following
criterion: Each defined category will receive a
number of points based within the noted specified
range, resulting in a final cumulative grade average
for each assignment.
|
|
Beginning |
Comprehension |
Progressing |
Mastery |
|
Thesis and Conclusion
1-20 |
Has no thesis and does
not have a conclusion that summarizes |
Includes one or the
other |
Thesis is stated in
the introduction, and repeated word-for-word
in the conclusion. The conclusion summarizes
the ideas/content |
Thesis is stated in
the introduction and reworded in the
conclusion. The conclusion summarizes the
ideas/content. |
|
Content
1-50 |
Body of essay has
little or no evidence-or completely
incorrect and irrelevant content, examples,
or evidence |
Body of essay has only
one example with correct and relevant
content |
Body of essay has only
two examples that offer support to their
thesis, but includes correct and relevant
content (or three examples with minor
mistakes in content) |
Body of essay has at
least three historically factual examples
that support the essay question, (using
correct facts, details, and evidence with
dates, people, and places) |
|
Number of Paragraphs
and sentences
1- 10 points |
Less than five
paragraphs |
Five paragraphs with
two or less having five sentences |
Five paragraphs with
five or more sentences in at least three of
the paragraphs |
Five paragraphs with
five or more sentences in each |
|
Spelling and Grammar
1-10 points |
Seven or more spelling
and grammar errors |
Four to six spelling
or grammar errors |
One to three spelling
and grammar errors |
No spelling or grammar
errors |
|
Writing Style
1- 10 points
|
Essay has no roadmap,
hard to follow. No transition sentences.
Order of information does not make sense |
Information is mostly
disorganized and hard to follow. Only 1
paragraph ends with a transition sentence. |
Information is mostly
organized and logically ordered. At least 2
paragraphs end with transition sentences. |
Essay flows well and
is easy to understand. Information is
provided in a logical order. Transition
sentences at the end of each paragraph. |
Quizzes and Exams
Quizzes and exams shall be
graded based on direct corollary knowledge
(identification, short answer, fill-in-the-blank,
matching, etc.) and written portions of the exam.
All exam and quiz responses requiring formal writing
shall be based on the above exampled writing rubric.